← All security clearance career guides

Personnel security eligibility guide

What disqualifies you from a security clearance? The whole-person rules

Most potentially concerning facts are not automatic lifetime bans. Federal adjudicators evaluate the complete record under 13 guideline areas and the whole-person concept. A small set of statutory restrictions also exists, but even that law contains important scope and waiver details.

Reviewed July 13, 2026. This educational guide summarizes public ODNI, DCSA, OPM, and U.S. Code sources; it is not legal advice or an eligibility opinion.

The short answer

A clearance decision is not normally made by matching one past event to a universal disqualifier list. DCSA says adjudicators consider available reliable information—favorable and unfavorable—and carefully weigh whole-person variables. An unresolved pattern, current conduct, lack of candor, or facts that create coercion or reliability risk may matter differently from isolated, old, corrected, or mitigated conduct.

A statutory restriction is not the same as an adjudicative concern

Statutory restrictions

Current federal law prohibits granting or renewing a clearance for a covered person who is an unlawful user of a controlled substance or an addict.

For SAP, Restricted Data, and SCI access, 50 U.S.C. §3343 also identifies specified incarceration, dishonorable discharge, and formally determined mental-incompetence circumstances. That subsection allows a written waiver in a meritorious case with mitigating factors.

Adjudicative concerns

The 13 guidelines cover a much wider range of conduct and circumstances. They can support an unfavorable decision even when the narrow statutory provisions do not apply.

They also require consideration of mitigating, favorable, and contextual evidence. A guideline heading is an area of review—not proof that a person is disqualified.

Read the current 50 U.S.C. §3343 text ↗

The 13 adjudicative guideline areas

Security Executive Agent Directive 4 organizes national-security eligibility review into these areas. The descriptions below identify the subject of each guideline; the official directive controls its exact conditions and mitigation language.

Allegiance to the United States

Conduct that raises doubt about loyalty to the United States or support for its constitutional system.

Foreign influence

Foreign contacts, interests, or circumstances that could create divided interests, pressure, coercion, or exploitation.

Foreign preference

Conduct or choices that may indicate preference for a foreign country over the United States.

Sexual behavior

Conduct is relevant when it involves criminality, coercion, exploitation, poor judgment, or vulnerability—not merely because it is private.

Personal conduct

Dishonesty, rule violations, failure to cooperate, or other behavior bearing on judgment, reliability, and trustworthiness.

Financial considerations

Unresolved financial problems, unexplained affluence, or irresponsible conduct that may create pressure or question judgment.

Alcohol consumption

A pattern of excessive use or alcohol-related behavior that raises reliability, judgment, or safety concerns.

Drug involvement and substance misuse

Illegal drug activity, misuse of legal substances, or conduct suggesting impaired judgment or a likelihood of recurrence.

Psychological conditions

Only conditions or behavior affecting judgment, reliability, stability, or trustworthiness are relevant; seeking care is not itself disqualifying.

Criminal conduct

Conduct indicating poor judgment, unreliability, or unwillingness to follow laws, rules, and regulations.

Handling protected information

Deliberate or negligent failure to protect classified or other protected information.

Outside activities

Certain employment, service, or support involving foreign people, organizations, governments, or interests.

Use of information technology

Unauthorized access, misuse, modification, destruction, or circumvention of security controls.
Read ODNI Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (PDF) ↗

What the whole-person concept changes

Whole-person review means both the concern and the evidence around it matter. Official guidance considers factors such as seriousness, circumstances, frequency and recency, age and maturity, voluntariness, rehabilitation, motivation, vulnerability to pressure or exploitation, and the likelihood that conduct will continue or recur.

Current pattern versus past event

Ongoing, repeated, escalating, or recent conduct can raise a different risk than isolated conduct that ended under credible changed circumstances.

Candor versus concealment

A fact may raise one concern; intentionally withholding requested information can create a separate personal-conduct concern.

Correction and rehabilitation

Documented resolution, treatment where appropriate, compliance, repayment, changed associations, or other durable behavior may be relevant.

Pressure and recurrence

Adjudicators consider whether circumstances create vulnerability to coercion or exploitation and whether the conduct is likely to happen again.
Read DCSA's whole-person and denial guidance ↗

Common disqualifier myths

“Seeking mental-health care costs you a clearance.”

No. Federal law prohibits a negative inference solely from seeking counseling, and DCSA says seeking appropriate care can demonstrate good judgment. Relevant behavior is evaluated for its effect on judgment, reliability, stability, and trustworthiness.

“Any debt or low credit score means automatic denial.”

No single public credit-score cutoff appears in the adjudicative guidelines. The review considers causes, pattern, responsibility, resolution, unexplained affluence, and security risk—not just a consumer score.

“A foreign relative automatically disqualifies you.”

Foreign contacts and interests can require detailed review, but the guideline evaluates the nature of the relationship, country, conflict, pressure, and vulnerability rather than using nationality alone as the answer.

“Any arrest or conviction creates a lifetime bar.”

Criminal conduct can support an unfavorable decision, but the statutory incarceration restriction is narrower than that claim and has a specific access scope and waiver provision. The complete facts and current official rules control.

“Answering yes on the SF-86 means denial.”

The form collects facts for investigation and adjudication. A truthful yes answer is not itself a decision; an inaccurate or incomplete answer may create an additional concern.

Read DCSA's mental-health eligibility guidance ↗

Before applying for a cleared job

  1. Read the posting literally

    Confirm whether the employer requires an active clearance or explicitly allows it to be obtained, along with the level, SCI, SAP, polygraph, citizenship, and workplace requirements.

  2. Preview the current official form

    The SF-86 asks for extensive history with different timeframes and definitions. Use the current OPM form to understand what records you may need; do not submit clearance information to a job board.

  3. Collect accurate dates and records

    Complete names, addresses, employment and residence dates, foreign contacts or activities, financial records, and disposition documents can reduce avoidable omissions and delay.

  4. Address ongoing issues honestly

    Resolution must be real. Do not manufacture a mitigation story, hide requested facts, or assume an internet checklist can adjudicate your case.

  5. Use an authorized security contact

    After sponsorship or a conditional offer, direct individual questions to the investigator, agency security office, or contractor Facility Security Officer—not a recruiter forum or Cleared Colorado.

Open the official OPM Standard Form 86 (PDF) ↗

If eligibility is denied or revoked

DCSA explains that an individual receives an opportunity to respond and appeal, but the process differs for military members, civilian personnel, and contractor employees. Contractor cases may proceed through the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals. Follow the notice, forum, evidence, and deadline instructions for the actual case; a general guide cannot preserve appeal rights or replace qualified counsel.

Review DCSA security decision appeal resources ↗Understand SORs, final decisions, appeals, and reconsideration →

Current Colorado jobs where a clearance may be obtainable

Cleared Colorado currently has 518 direct-employer listings that explicitly allow the required Secret-or-higher clearance to be obtainable rather than already active. That source wording does not guarantee sponsorship, an interim decision, final eligibility, access, or a start date.

Browse all obtainable-clearance jobs →

Follow the jobs that fit your search

Save an accountless alert by clearance, workplace, employer, keyword, or polygraph. Confirm eligibility questions only through the sponsoring organization's authorized security process.